Works of Pure Shock-Factor and Extremity Cross the Line that Defines Art
There’s an artist whose work I’ve admired for some time. I’ve seen many of his paintings in my favorite publication, “Architectural Digest,” where his work is frequently featured in the homes of some of the most prestigious professionals and celebrities. Not knowing much about this artist, I delved into the online world to learn about his history, inspiration, and view other work.
Enter controversial artist Damien Hirst, who is described as having a “varied unflinching, fatalistic and darkly humorous view of existence.” Upon discovery of his works that he is most well-known for, all I can say is “wow, really?” Exploring the subjects of life, death, and the human condition, two works – both live, real-time installations – stood out from the crowd.
A Thousand Years (1990): Exposes the cycle of life within the confines of a two-sided clear box. One side contains a separate box with a small hole in which maggots hatch into flies, who then journey to the other side where they feed on a bloody, severed cow’s head lying on the floor.
Let’s Eat Outdoors Today (2011): Also features a two-sided clear enclosure, one side encasing maggots lying in trays on a barbecue, slowly developing into flies and then venturing to the other side where they consume the food remains left over on the table. Hirst’s perspective on this work: “’I was thinking about how we all avoid dirt, but we all ultimately go back into dirt. I was very interested in how we were trying to isolate the horror from our lives and remove it.”
Hirst attributes his inspiration to Francis Bacon, “absorbing the painter’s visceral images and obsessions early on and giving them concrete existence in sculptural form with works like A Thousand Years.” He is described as “pushing the boundaries,” and becoming one of the “most influential artists of our time.”
While I have a very open mind, am more predisposed to off-the-wall art, and appreciate the extreme visuals and messaging, as do I greatly respect and appreciate the artistic, aggressive – frequently violent – visions of Bacon, Goya, and others like them, I honestly found Hirst’s sculptural works to be a disappointment, more like B-movies, quite honestly, poorly done, and in no way capturing, communicating, or revealing the inner and outer darkness that the likes of Bacon and Goya achieved. Maybe it’s because I’ve been witness to this lifecycle of carcasses, maggots, and feasting flies and so the impact was less than inspiring and thought-provoking.
I’m glad to see Hirst has explored the painting medium and still find these works fabulous. But it disturbed me to think that because of the shock value of his work that he has been so highly acclaimed and I have to wonder, when should “art” no longer be defined as “art”?
We’ve all heard the expression, “one person’s junk is another person’s treasure.” Actually, I believe the original expression is “one man’s junk is another man’s treasure,” but since I’m a chick picker, I modified it to fit the times. And it’s also no news that junk has been an art form for years. However, the popularity of “junk as art” is taking on a new evolution.
While I was doing my art demonstration at the
Some years ago, I used to refer to myself as an “aspiring artist.” One day, over drinks with a long-time friend who is not only an art connoisseur but also an artist and art collector, we contemplated this subject. As I used this term to describe myself, he questioned it. Well, of course, I defended my archaic labeling by saying that I was not – could never be – in the same arena as the true art masters of the past and present (many come to your mind, I’m sure). He blatantly said: “Lilly, you’re either an artist or you’re not.”